2-19-04 Bemerkungen über 1-18-02 Tatbestand
Vladimir and I are having serious problems with Jesuit conspirators who takeover my mother’s 666-Computer program and give her amnesia. She is having serious amnesia problems. She can’t remember important events from one day to the next. Also, her thinking and attitudes are almost 100% manipulated by Jesuits. She is an UNWILLING AGENT (see my CONSPIRACY LAWS).
Unfortunately, this problem will not be solved until we can rewrite her programs, in order to block the programs which the Jesuits currently have 666-Computer control over.
This has been one of the strongest tools in the Jesuits’ arsenal–which is, their ability to use the 666-Computer to control the thoughts, actions, emotions and attitudes of persons. They can literally control a person like an automaton, and the performance is VERY CONVINCING. JESUITS ARE THE BEST ACTORS ON THE PLANET. THIS IS APPARENTLY A TACTIC THEY HAVE USED FOR YEARS. This is how they get so much “cooperation”.
We are having serious problems with the MANDATORY BLOCKED PROGRAMS document(s)–(see my CONSPIRACY LAWS), which has/have been deliberately written by our BLOCKED PROGRAMS COMMITTEE to allow Jesuits to maintain 666-Computer control over persons (via satellite☛the illegal control goes right into the person’s programming through the 666-Computer –through a “loophole” in the programming which allows the satellite interference). This “loophole” in the programming allows Jesuits (via satellite) to wrest 666-Computer control away from the PLP. The German PROGRAMMING-AUDITOR network is currently working on this very complex problem. Our BLOCKED PROGRAMS COMMITTEE lied to us when they stated that the MANDATORY BLOCKED PROGRAMS would be effective in blocking the required programs. We discovered the inadequacies in the MANDATORY BLOCKED PROGRAMS documents within the past week. 666-Computer programs are extremely complex and require advanced and sophisticated programming skills–so, unfortunately this problem (which is the ability to block the life-threatening programs and to block those programs which have been used consistently to violate CONSPIRACY LAWS) may not be fixed right away.
I noticed in today’s paper, there was a special section about Romance writers and their networks. I have always had a unique approach to my writing. I only attended a writer’s network in Houston (1994 and 1995) and I only went to a couple of meetings. To me, networking with other writers is not my style. I am afraid that if I make other writers my best friends that I will lose the contact with the “real people” of the world and may end up becoming claustrophobic in my writing.
For this reason, my closest friends have been non-writers–this has been deliberate (on my part). I choose to mingle with the non-writers of the world in order to give my novels the mainstream feel (which is my style). I’ve actually created my own style and it is very unique and very different from other writers. I don’t think I could have done this if I had mingled too much with other writers.
I even use non-writers to critique my writing. I just tell them to tell me what they liked and what they did not like (when they read my writings). I usually pick intelligent people to critique my writing and I give them some guidelines on how I want them to critique the writing. I’ve had very good critiques using this method. I tell them not to worry about hurting my feelings.
However, I did not let anyone critique Silver Skies, I critiqued it myself. I have an inborn ability to be able to objectively analyze and critique my writing and usually do a better job of critiquing it than anyone else. My secret: I pick the book up and pretend like I didn’t write it and just start reading it. Anything that bores me or strikes me as unbelievable or irrelevant or disgusts me (as I read) I note it and then go back and make the required changes.
I don’t worry about whether I think the writing will impress anyone, I write it to IMPRESS MYSELF. I told myself, as I wrote Silver Skies, that if no one likes it but you, at least you wrote what you like to read and that will give you tremendous satisfaction–regardless of the outcome.
What do I like to read? Charles Dicken’s David Copperfield. Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace. Colleen McCullough’s The Thornbirds. Leon Uris’ Exodus. Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. So when I wrote Silver Skies, I tried to make it a little bit of all of my favorite books. All of the above books have a love story in them, but they also deal with other things and often cover earthshaking and historical events. That’s what I like to read, so that’s what I write. I took what I liked from these pieces of writing and updated it and put it into my writing. The exceptions are The Thornbirds and David Copperfield and Jane Eyre. The Thornbirds and David Copperfield and Jane Eyre are very strong character stories and don’t deal as much with historical and earth-shaking events. I love to read character stories, so I write character stories.
The biggest problem I have with most American romance writers is that I feel that American romance writers are weak in characterization. The characters are too predictable, too ordinary–not interesting enough. Above all else, I consider myself a character writer–I specialize in characters. For this reason, I love to read Charles Dickens.
Secondly, I consider myself a romance writer. Thirdly, I consider myself a writer of issues and current events. I incorporate a lot of events of historical importance into my writing, to give my novel a mainstream feel. I also like a little bit of mystery in my plot, but I don’t like my mystery sub-plot to overwhelm the character or romance or issues emphasis in the novel. I deliberately create a “mainstream” voice as I write, in order to push my novel out of the Harlequin romance category. I definitely don’t like to write a category romance, because I don’t like to read this. A category romance isn’t broad enough for me and the characters in a category romance don’t have enough complexities for me. I like to deal with issues of historical importance to make my leads heroic and intelligent and thoughtful people. I like to give my writing a broader focus and to deal with more than just a romance. I like to deal with life issues.
Even though I loved Gone With the Wind as a teenager, it lost its appeal to me when I got older. I didn’t care for the heroine Scarlett O’Hara. I felt she wasn’t complex and thoughtful enough to be an interesting character. Though she had the spunk to be an interesting character. What I like about Gone With the Wind was how it covered an event of historical importance –the American Civil War. I did not care for how Margaret Mitchell wrote the love story in Gone With the Wind, and was determined not to imitate her love story at all. In general, I don’t admire love stories written by American writers. However, the way Margaret Mitchell handled writing about the history of the Old South is brilliant. She’s not a brilliant character or romance writer, but she’s brilliant at historical fiction (which deals with an event of catastrophic importance in history). The U.S. Civil War changed the United States unalterably. The U.S. has never recovered from its civil war. The U.S. Civil War left scars that last today; and planted the seeds which, I believe, will eventually destroy the United States. Despite the fact that it is touted as a war against slavery, it was actually a war for states’ rights. The states lost and this increased the power of the federal government. The outcome of the U.S. Civil War resulted in amendments to the Constitution which have totally changed the way the American people are governed and have made it easier for the Jesuits (via the law and government) to takeover the United States. The Jesuits orchestrated the American Civil War and financed the South in order to start the war. The Jesuits planned to use the South to set up their Catholic kingdom in the United States. This is kind of ironic since the South was fighting for states’ rights. Neither side in this war was completely right or wrong. There were well-meaning, but wrong, people on both sides of this conflict. In most wars orchestrated by Jesuits, this is the case.
Back to romance. . .American writers don’t give a romance the layers and complexities that I find fascinating, like you find in The Thornbirds or in David Copperfield or in Jane Eyre. To me, a romance (to be interesting) has to have a strong character story in it. I don’t emulate American romance writers. They don’t impress me.
Time now is 9:09 p.m. My mom’s white cat, Powder, has been missing all day. I have called for her all day and she has not come home. If it is found out that any person has deliberately, knowingly and willingly kept this cat in their home, so that she can’t come home; or if any deliberate, knowing and willing harm comes to this cat–the person(s) who participated in this scheme will receive the death penalty as a JESUIT CONSPIRATOR. By holding this cat, that person is deliberately attempting to draw attention to a SIGNIFICANT PERSON’s ethnography.
One time, when my mom and Bill went to Las Vegas and Brent Spiner ended up on the jet with them (on the way back)–Powder was mysteriously missing and wouldn’t come home. When she finally showed up, she hid herself all day behind the sofa, like she had been tortured by someone. So, it appears, someone may be trying to repeat what happened to this cat, the last time a significant event occurred (when Brent was on my mom and Bill’s jet) something terrible happened to Powder (the white cat) and this cat was in my care. Any attempt to repeat that incident with Powder, will result in the death penalty as a JESUIT CONSPIRATOR to anyone who deliberately, knowingly and willingly makes such an attempt. If someone is holding this cat (and we may be able to determine this via 666-Computer), even if the cat is OK, that person(s) (who’s holding this cat) must make a CONFESSION STATEMENT on RUSSIAN BROADCAST NEWS.
Also, if anyone deliberately, willingly and knowingly feeds this cat with the motive to make it so she won’t want to come home, that person will receive the death penalty as a JESUIT CONSPIRATOR. Motive can be determined by 666-Computer analysis. If the cat’s hungry, she’ll come home to eat–but if someone feeds her, she may not. She sees me as the woman who keeps her locked up in the house. And the 666-Computer has made this cat very claustrophobic.
Electronically signed: Gail Chord Schuler
Place: Melbourne, FL